<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Azure for you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.componentfactory.com/blog/2010/03/no-azure-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.componentfactory.com/blog/2010/03/no-azure-for-you/</link>
	<description>Windows Forms Controls for .NET Smart Client Applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:30:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Codie Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.componentfactory.com/blog/2010/03/no-azure-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3138</link>
		<dc:creator>Codie Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.componentfactory.com/blog/?p=618#comment-3138</guid>
		<description>You could toy with the HTML5 canvas tag - FF, Chrome , IE9 implementations for future ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could toy with the HTML5 canvas tag &#8211; FF, Chrome , IE9 implementations for future ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.componentfactory.com/blog/2010/03/no-azure-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3024</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.componentfactory.com/blog/?p=618#comment-3024</guid>
		<description>I agree that using standard tech like AJAX + JSON would allow it to work across all browsers and devices which is a real plus for sticking to accepted internet standards. But I want to create a desktop quality experience and for that I need to use Flash or Silverlight. As I already know .NET and C# it means Silverlight is the obvious answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that using standard tech like AJAX + JSON would allow it to work across all browsers and devices which is a real plus for sticking to accepted internet standards. But I want to create a desktop quality experience and for that I need to use Flash or Silverlight. As I already know .NET and C# it means Silverlight is the obvious answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.componentfactory.com/blog/2010/03/no-azure-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3021</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.componentfactory.com/blog/?p=618#comment-3021</guid>
		<description>Have you considered AJAX + JSON or some other well formed output to allow your visitor&#039;s browser to pull down the data and deal with it in script?  I&#039;m definitely against the idea of requiring Silverlight to do just about about anything.  The same goes for Flash.  With the power of the current AJAX libraries, you can get almost as far without the need for proprietary client environments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you considered AJAX + JSON or some other well formed output to allow your visitor&#8217;s browser to pull down the data and deal with it in script?  I&#8217;m definitely against the idea of requiring Silverlight to do just about about anything.  The same goes for Flash.  With the power of the current AJAX libraries, you can get almost as far without the need for proprietary client environments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.componentfactory.com/blog/2010/03/no-azure-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3017</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.componentfactory.com/blog/?p=618#comment-3017</guid>
		<description>Aha. I had not seen this announcement. That is certainly good news. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha. I had not seen this announcement. That is certainly good news. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus</title>
		<link>http://www.componentfactory.com/blog/2010/03/no-azure-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3016</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.componentfactory.com/blog/?p=618#comment-3016</guid>
		<description>According to this MSDN post, it will be available in April 2010.

http://blogs.msdn.com/gwillis/archive/2009/12/21/launching-windows-azure-in-australia.aspx

(See Greg Willis comment from Feb 26th.)

/M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to this MSDN post, it will be available in April 2010.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/gwillis/archive/2009/12/21/launching-windows-azure-in-australia.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/gwillis/archive/2009/12/21/launching-windows-azure-in-australia.aspx</a></p>
<p>(See Greg Willis comment from Feb 26th.)</p>
<p>/M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

